Windmill
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if your team writes code and wants self-hostable, flexible workflow orchestration . and can patch fast.
Comparison
Windmill and Temporal both land on Depends.
Buy if your team writes code and wants self-hostable, flexible workflow orchestration . and can patch fast.
Buy it if your backend runs long-running, crash-sensitive workflows and you have engineers to code them.
| Compare | Windmill | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Engineering teams automating internal workflows | Long-running backend workflows |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical teams wanting no-code automation | Simple cron jobs or scheduled scripts |
| Privacy | Actively exploited CVE-2026-29059 (missing authorization) affects versions 1.56.0-1.614.0; official security page not found.⁸ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.16 |
| Support quality | No evidence found | No support quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Public sources position Windmill as a code-first, open-source platform engineers like, but independent review quotes are scarce.⁴ | Developers praise crash-proof workflow recovery but describe adopting Temporal as a coding paradigm shift.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | CVE-2026-29059 actively exploited as of July 2026; patch immediately if self-hosting⁹ | Large payloads exceed platform limits; external storage workarounds required |