shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Wonderlic?

Select, Develop, and Retain your employees - wonderlic.com

Depends. Buy if you hire at volume and want validated cognitive screening backed by 90 years of history. Skip if you're a small team — quote-only pricing and candidate resentment make simpler assessment tools a better fit.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated, so review detail is limited.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • High-volume hourly hiring
  • Enterprise HR teams
  • Regulated roles: police, nursing schools

Not for

  • Small teams with a few hires a year
  • Budget buyers needing published pricing
  • Teams sensitive to candidate backlash
  • Buyers wanting work-sample skills tests, not cognitive tests

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Expect a sales call before seeing any pricing number

medium

Cheaper rivals like Criteria CCAT and Predictive Index undercut it

medium

Widespread test-prep sites mean scores can be coached

medium

Candidate resentment can damage your employer brand

Pros and cons

Pros

  • G2 Leader in talent assessment with 189+ reviews
  • Cognitive test pedigree dating to 1936, NFL-famous
  • One platform for hiring, development, and retention
  • AI-backed proctoring protects test integrity
  • Broad adoption: 363 tracked companies

Cons

  • No published pricing; quote-based sales only
  • Recruiters publicly hunt for cheaper alternatives
  • Many candidates hate the timed test
  • Large prep industry exists to game scores
  • NFL banned it from draft evaluation

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/30/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x5security x2news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Quote-only pricing; recruiters seek cheaper options
  • Ease of use: 4/5. G2 reviewers call it convenient
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Cognitive, personality, development, integrity tools
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. Published security page, AI proctoring; unverified
  • 189+ G2 reviews G2 Leader in talent assessment
  • Not published Starting price Quote-based sales only
  • 1936 Test created Per Wikipedia
  • 363 Companies tracked using it Per TheirStack data

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Employers rate it well on G2 (189+ reviews), while many candidates on Reddit resent taking the timed test.

“Just took the Wonderlic test. Opinion???”
Reddit, r/sales
“Wonderlic Test: To take or not to take. I hate taking these”
Reddit, r/recruitinghell
“Less costly alternative to Wonderlic?”
Reddit, r/recruiting

Alternatives

Compare Wonderlic with each alternative.

  • Criteria (CCAT)

    Cheaper cognitive aptitude test, self-serve

  • Predictive Index

    Behavioral plus cognitive assessment at lower cost

  • TestGorilla

    Skills and work-sample tests with transparent pricing

Companies that use it

  • Sweetwater
Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated, so review detail is limited.

NFL-famous hiring tests for high-volume HR teams; quote-only pricing and candidate resentment make it overkill for small teams.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources; snippets truncated, so review detail is limited.

Sources

  1. Wonderlic homepagewonderlic.com
    official
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. news
  8. news
  9. security
  10. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.