shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Zenodo?

Skip to main - zenodo.org

Worth it. Buy if you're a researcher who needs free, citable hosting with DOIs and GitHub archiving. Skip it for sensitive data or anything needing dependable support.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources: official Zenodo docs, university guides, Reddit threads, and one GitHub moderation incident.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

€0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Researchers sharing citable datasets
  • Code releases via GitHub
  • NIH and EU grant data compliance
  • Community-curated collections

Not for

  • Sensitive or confidential data
  • Anyone needing SLAs or responsive support
  • Mission-critical primary storage
  • Peer review — it hosts work, it does not review it

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Moderation can block accounts and delete hundreds of records without prior notice

medium

No SLA: CERN support slow and stats pipeline reportedly broken for months

medium

Content revocation policy means deposition is not an archival guarantee

low

Download statistics unreliable — don't cite them for impact metrics

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to upload and free to access, permanently
  • Mints DOIs so work is citable and credited
  • GitHub integration preserves code releases automatically
  • Backed by CERN and European Commission funding
  • Accepted by NIH and recommended by PLOS

Cons

  • No real support; users report broken statistics pipeline
  • Account blocked and 850+ records removed without warning
  • Policy allows content revocation — not guaranteed permanent
  • Hosting only; it is not peer review
  • Unsuitable for sensitive data per NIH guidance

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/25/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x5review x3news x2

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • €0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Completely free, publicly funded
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Web uploads plus automated GitHub archiving
  • Feature depth: 4/5. DOIs, versioning, communities, GitHub integration
  • Support quality: 2/5. Slow replies, broken stats, silent account bans
  • Security posture: 3/5. CERN-hosted with published policies, no audits cited
  • €0 Price Free to upload and free to access
  • Yes Free tier No paid tiers found in sources
  • CERN Operated by Funded by the European Commission

Pricing

Free

€0

  • Free uploads and downloads
  • DOI minting per record
  • GitHub release archiving

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Researchers see it as a genuinely useful free service but gripe about weak support, moderation surprises, and unreliable stats.

“Zenodo is useful as a public service”
Reddit, r/Physics
“I know zenodo is not a peer review”
Reddit, r/academia
“Zenodo (operated by CERN) statistics pipeline still broken”
Reddit, r/CERN

Companies that use it

  • IPBES
  • Harvard Medical School
  • NIH (NCCIH)⁵
  • PLOS One
Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources: official Zenodo docs, university guides, Reddit threads, and one GitHub moderation incident.

Free CERN-run repository that mints DOIs for research. Great for citability; wrong for sensitive data.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources: official Zenodo docs, university guides, Reddit threads, and one GitHub moderation incident.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Zenodo Infrastructureabout.zenodo.org
    official
  3. Zenodo Policiesabout.zenodo.org
    official
  4. official
  5. news
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. official
  10. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.