shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Ziptility Review

Worth it

Should I use Ziptility?

Asset management software for small water and wastewater utilities. The map, the work orders, and the records in one app your crew runs from the truck. - ziptility.com

· 1 month ago

Small water or wastewater utilities drowning in paper records and truck-based work orders shortlist it. It is purpose-built and explicitly positioned against enterprise GIS. Large utilities, non-water asset owners, and buyers who need published pricing or verified user reviews first look elsewhere.

Confidence

Low. Based on 12 public sources; most product claims trace to Ziptility's own site, independent review evidence is thin.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence available
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence available
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Small water & wastewater utilities
  • Crews running work orders from trucks
  • Utilities replacing paper records and clipboards
  • Teams priced out of enterprise GIS

Not for

  • Large utilities with GIS departments, enterprise GIS does this deeper
  • Non-water industries: IT, facilities, general asset tracking
  • Procurement teams requiring published pricing before a demo
  • Guess: utilities wanting billing and customer payments bundled in

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

No public pricing in reviewed sources. Expect a sales call before knowing cost.

medium

Crowded category: 451 US utility asset-management platforms, vendor longevity unproven.

medium

Data capture burden lands on your crew; map records get built field by field.

low

Niche rivals (Ampstun, EDAMS) target the same buyers, demo two before signing.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Purpose-built for small water and wastewater utilities
  • Map, work orders, and records in one mobile field app
  • Positioned as a simpler, cheaper alternative to enterprise GIS
  • Partnered with BAMI-I on asset-management planning for a small utility
  • Described as user-friendly and cost-reducing in comparison listings

Cons

  • Vertical-locked: water and wastewater operations only
  • Simplicity-first positioning implies less GIS and analytics depth
  • No independent user reviews surfaced; coverage limited to directories

Sources & method

- 6 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x2security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 4/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 6

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence available
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Positioned user-friendly; built for crews, not GIS staff
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Map, work orders, records bundled, not enterprise GIS depth
  • Support quality. No support evidence available
  • Security posture: 3/5. Publishes security page; no independent verification found
  • 451 platforms Competitive category US utility asset-management tools counted by RevenueBase
  • 0 Independent reviews found Only directory comparisons in sources reviewed
  • Not listed Public pricing No tiers visible in reviewed sources

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

No independent user reviews of Ziptility appeared in the sources reviewed.

Third-party coverage is limited to software-directory comparisons.

Full analysis

Based on 12 public sources; most product claims trace to Ziptility's own site, independent review evidence is thin.

Right-sized field asset tool for small water utilities. Good fit on paper. But no public pricing or independent reviews. Pilot first.

Methodology

Based on 12 public sources; most product claims trace to Ziptility's own site, independent review evidence is thin.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. Ziptility homepageziptility.com
    official
  2. Ziptility product security pageziptility.com
    security
  3. Compare Ampstun vs. Ziptilityslashdot.org
    review
  4. Compare EDAMS Assets Management vs. Ziptilityslashdot.org
    review
  5. BAMI-I partnered with Ziptility and BFU on small-utility asset management planbami-i.com
    news
  6. Top 25 utility asset management platforms (US)revenuebase.ai
    news

Add this review to your site

Ziptility earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Worth it Ziptility Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.