shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Addigy vs SimpleMDM

Addigy and SimpleMDM both land on Depends.

Addigy versus SimpleMDM
CompareAddigySimpleMDM
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forMSPs managing multiple Apple client fleetsAll-Apple device fleets
Who it's not forMixed Windows/Android fleets . Addigy manages Apple onlyWindows or Android-heavy fleets . no support
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.14
Support qualityOnly vendor's own guarantee claims found.30-minute response is vendor-claimed only
Public sentimentUsers . especially MSPs . praise the smooth, simple experience, while grumbling about per-device pricing creep.¹IT forum threads cite SimpleMDM as a frequent Apple-focused alternative to Meraki and Jamf, but few detailed user reviews surfaced.
Biggest gotchaPer-device pricing means costs scale directly with fleet size; MSPs on Reddit flag this.²Pricing not public . model per-device costs during the trial before committing13

Pick Addigy when

  • MSPs managing multiple Apple client fleets
  • Apple-only companies (Mac, iPhone, iPad)
  • Lean IT teams running 200+ Macs
  • Teams wanting MDM plus RMM in one

When Addigy is not a fit

  • Mixed Windows/Android fleets . Addigy manages Apple only
  • Anyone with under ~20 Apple devices . serious overkill
  • Buyers needing transparent, published pricing upfront

Pick SimpleMDM when

  • All-Apple device fleets
  • Small-to-mid IT teams
  • Fast, low-effort rollouts
  • Cost-sensitive MDM buyers

When SimpleMDM is not a fit

  • Windows or Android-heavy fleets . no support
  • Windows-first IT shops; Intune fits better
  • Buyers needing published security certifications
  • Teams wanting one cross-platform UEM tool

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. Addigy Pricingaddigy.com
    official
  5. official
  6. news
  7. news
  8. security
  9. security
  10. official
  11. news
  12. news
  13. SimpleMDM homepagesimplemdm.com
    official
  14. security
  15. review
  16. review