Adsterra
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Only risk-tolerant affiliate marketers chasing cheap, high-volume traffic should use it; some users do profit.
New check
Comparison
Adsterra and Monetag both land on Depends.
Only risk-tolerant affiliate marketers chasing cheap, high-volume traffic should use it; some users do profit.
Workable for publishers with high-volume, brand-insensitive traffic who accept aggressive ad formats and will test payouts carefully.
| Compare | Adsterra | Monetag |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Affiliate media buyers testing cheap traffic | High-volume social or download traffic |
| Who it's not for | Brand-safe publishers . malvertising can hijack your site | Brand-sensitive media or news sites |
| Privacy | No CVEs found, but recurring malvertising and site-hijack reports; Adsterra publishes anti-fraud policies.⁷ | Two CVEs in its WordPress plugin; domains flagged as riskware by some tools; named in malvertising research coverage.15 |
| Support quality | Payout disputes reportedly go unresolved | Trustpilot ~4/5 but payment complaints exist |
| Public sentiment | Polarized: some publishers earn well, while many report scam allegations, hijacked sites, and payout problems.¹ | Reviews are sharply split: some publishers report steady earnings, while others accuse it of scam behavior and question whether it pays at all.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Multiple users report flags or CPM slashes right before payout thresholds | WordPress plugin needed security fixes (CVE-2024-52500, CVE-2026-24551); unpatched installs are exposed.14 |