Adsterra
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Only risk-tolerant affiliate marketers chasing cheap, high-volume traffic should use it; some users do profit.
New check
Comparison
Adsterra and PropellerAds both land on Depends.
Only risk-tolerant affiliate marketers chasing cheap, high-volume traffic should use it; some users do profit.
Buy if you're an affiliate or CPA marketer testing cheap global pop/push traffic and can afford to lose your test budget.
| Compare | Adsterra | PropellerAds |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Affiliate media buyers testing cheap traffic | Affiliate/CPA media buyers |
| Who it's not for | Brand-safe publishers . malvertising can hijack your site | Brand-name advertisers . pop-under traffic reads as spam |
| Privacy | No CVEs found, but recurring malvertising and site-hijack reports; Adsterra publishes anti-fraud policies.⁷ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Payout disputes reportedly go unresolved | G2 users report account-management issues |
| Public sentiment | Polarized: some publishers earn well, while many report scam allegations, hijacked sites, and payout problems.¹ | Feedback is split: some affiliate marketers report profitable campaigns, while beginners and complaint-site users describe losses, suspicion of scams, and account friction.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Multiple users report flags or CPM slashes right before payout thresholds | Cheap pop/push traffic quality varies; budget for heavy testing losses |