Altss
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a fund actively raising LP capital and can absorb a five-figure per-seat annual bill.
New check
Comparison
Altss and Preqin both land on Depends.
Buy if you run a fund actively raising LP capital and can absorb a five-figure per-seat annual bill.
Buy if you're an institutional allocator, fundraiser, or consultant who needs private-markets data daily and can absorb $25k+/year.
| Compare | Altss | Preqin |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | PE/VC/credit funds raising LP capital | Institutional allocators and LP diligence teams |
| Who it's not for | B2B sales teams . Apollo-class tools fit better | Emerging or first-time fund managers . priced out |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.12 | No confirmed breaches found; Hudson Rock flags 205 infostealer credentials tied to; product security page is published. |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | No user support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | User reviews are few but uniformly positive, praising data freshness and its edge over legacy databases.³ | Users find Preqin Pro genuinely useful for private-markets data, but pricing opacity and a middling 3.8/5 comparison score temper enthusiasm. |
| Biggest gotcha | No self-serve pricing. Third parties report $12K-$15.5K per seat annually . budget five figures per user.² | Entry tier runs ~$25k/year; full multi-asset-class datasets cost more16 |