shouldiuse.io

Comparison

AltStreet vs PitchBook

AltStreet and PitchBook both land on Depends.

AltStreet versus PitchBook
CompareAltStreetPitchBook
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forFamily offices allocating across alternativesVC and PE deal teams
Who it's not forCasual investors making one or two crowdfunding betsStartups fundraising on a budget
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁶No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Support qualityNo support evidence found.Full-service onboarding advertised; thin independent data
Public sentimentNo verified user reviews found; third-party sites cite AltStreet's research findings rather than customer feedback.⁹Users praise the data depth and feature set but repeatedly call the pricing exorbitant and flag a buggy Excel plugin.11
Biggest gotchaPricing tiers not shown publicly; subscribe page gates actual costs behind signup.⁴Opaque, negotiated pricing; expect five-figure annual contracts per seat14

Pick AltStreet when

  • Family offices allocating across alternatives
  • RIAs vetting crowdfunding platforms
  • Researchers needing fee-normalized alt data
  • Diligence on pre-IPO SPVs

When AltStreet is not a fit

  • Casual investors making one or two crowdfunding bets
  • Anyone requiring SOC 2 or vendor security docs upfront
  • Public-markets-only portfolios
  • Teams wanting free data; no visible free tier

Pick PitchBook when

  • VC and PE deal teams
  • Investment banks and M&A advisors
  • Analysts benchmarking private companies
  • Firms needing fund and LP performance data

When PitchBook is not a fit

  • Startups fundraising on a budget
  • Small teams that just need a contact list
  • Solo founders doing occasional research
  • Sales teams . buy sales-intelligence software instead

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. official
  5. official
  6. Security pagealtstreet.investments
    security
  7. news
  8. review
  9. news
  10. official
  11. review
  12. review
  13. review
  14. official
  15. review
  16. review