Arc
Depends
Confidence: Low
Public evidence on arc.dev is thin, but it fits companies hiring vetted remote developers, designers, or marketers for freelance or full-time roles.
Comparison
Arc and Upwork both land on Depends.
Public evidence on arc.dev is thin, but it fits companies hiring vetted remote developers, designers, or marketers for freelance or full-time roles.
Good fit if you occasionally need freelance help and can stomach the fee stack; poor fit for full-time hires or freelancers who can find work elsewhere.
| Compare | Arc | Upwork |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Companies hiring vetted remote developers | Occasional freelance hires |
| Who it's not for | One-off gig work . use Upwork instead | Full-time, long-term hires |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁵ | Runs a HackerOne bug bounty and enterprise security program; one alleged, unconfirmed recruiter/freelancer database leak circulated.14 |
| Support quality | No support reviews found | PissedConsumer and Trustpilot complaint volume; dispute stories |
| Public sentiment | No substantive written reviews of surfaced in the sources; only a 4.7/5 G2 rating across 24 seller-level reviews.³ | Sentiment splits: clients still find talent easily, but many freelancers and some clients say fees, Connects, and support have eroded the value.⁸ |
| Biggest gotcha | No rates shown in sources; costs stay unclear until you talk to sales.¹ | Freelancers buy Connects per bid; spend adds up before earning anything |