shouldiuse.io

Comparison

archive.today (archive.ph) vs Perma

archive.today (archive.ph) and Perma both land on Depends.

archive.today (archive.ph) versus Perma
Comparearchive.today (archive.ph)Perma
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forCasual citation snapshotsLaw reviews and courts
Who it's not forAnything needing guaranteed retention . no SLATeams wanting a simple URL shortener
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁷No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.11
Support qualityGuess: no visible support; reported issues unresolved.No support evidence found
Public sentimentReddit users report the service frequently fails to capture pages, with some archived links expiring and no visible fixes.¹No genuine user reviews of surfaced; results were dominated by the unrelated PERMA wellbeing model and other 'Perma' brands.⁹
Biggest gotchaNo uptime guarantee; captures fail without notice¹Crawler found no security page content; request audit docs before institutional purchase11

Pick archive.today (archive.ph) when

  • Casual citation snapshots
  • Journalists saving pages ad hoc
  • Data hoarders and lost-media hunters

When archive.today (archive.ph) is not a fit

  • Anything needing guaranteed retention . no SLA
  • Bulk or automated archiving pipelines
  • Businesses needing a support contact
  • Legal-grade evidence preservation

Pick Perma when

  • Law reviews and courts
  • Academic authors citing URLs
  • Journalists archiving sources

When Perma is not a fit

  • Teams wanting a simple URL shortener
  • Businesses expecting team-collaboration features
  • Buyers needing proven security documentation before adopting
  • Any small team without citation or compliance needs

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. official
  7. security
  8. New Functionality - Perma.cc Blogarchive.blogs.harvard.edu
    official
  9. news
  10. news
  11. security