Castor
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run regulated clinical trials and can live with sales-led, per-study pricing; it is a legitimate, well-funded EDC.
New check
Comparison
Castor and OpenClinica both land on Depends.
Buy if you run regulated clinical trials and can live with sales-led, per-study pricing; it is a legitimate, well-funded EDC.
Buy if you run regulated clinical trials and need a validated, compliance-heavy EDC (ISO 27001, SOC 2, FedRAMP program).
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Clinical research teams | Sponsors and CROs running regulated trials |
| Who it's not for | Anyone not running clinical trials | Small labs needing a quick simple database |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.10 | ISO 27001 certified, SOC 2 audited, MFA available . but two 2025 CVEs (XXE and a CVSS 8.8 path traversal) were disclosed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No directional evidence found in sources |
| Public sentiment | Public review detail is thin in sources reviewed; G2 shows roughly 129 category reviews with users citing quick study builds.¹ | Reviews are middling . a 3.6/5 aggregate over 61 reviews . with buyers most often comparing it head-to-head against Castor, Medrio, and Medidata.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | Quote-based pricing means demos and negotiation before seeing any number⁷ | Self-hosted Community Edition means you own patching, upgrades, and regulatory validation.16 |