shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Castor vs OpenClinica

Castor and OpenClinica both land on Depends.

Castor

Depends
Confidence: Medium

Buy if you run regulated clinical trials and can live with sales-led, per-study pricing; it is a legitimate, well-funded EDC.

Add this comparison to your site

Put the Castor vs OpenClinica badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent comparison.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Castor versus OpenClinica
CompareCastorOpenClinica
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forClinical research teamsSponsors and CROs running regulated trials
Who it's not forAnyone not running clinical trialsSmall labs needing a quick simple database
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.10ISO 27001 certified, SOC 2 audited, MFA available . but two 2025 CVEs (XXE and a CVSS 8.8 path traversal) were disclosed.
Support qualityNo support evidence in sourcesNo directional evidence found in sources
Public sentimentPublic review detail is thin in sources reviewed; G2 shows roughly 129 category reviews with users citing quick study builds.¹Reviews are middling . a 3.6/5 aggregate over 61 reviews . with buyers most often comparing it head-to-head against Castor, Medrio, and Medidata.13
Biggest gotchaQuote-based pricing means demos and negotiation before seeing any number⁷Self-hosted Community Edition means you own patching, upgrades, and regulatory validation.16

Pick Castor when

  • Clinical research teams
  • Biotech running regulated trials
  • Academic and non-commercial studies
  • Remote/decentralized trial research

When Castor is not a fit

  • Anyone not running clinical trials
  • Small teams needing a simple survey or contact list
  • Buyers wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
  • Non-regulated internal data collection

Pick OpenClinica when

  • Sponsors and CROs running regulated trials
  • Multi-centre academic studies
  • Government-adjacent research needing FedRAMP
  • Teams consolidating recruitment and EDC

When OpenClinica is not a fit

  • Small labs needing a quick simple database
  • Non-clinical surveys or registries
  • Teams without capacity for study build and validation
  • Buyers wanting self-serve transparent pricing

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. Castor Pricingcastoredc.com
    official
  8. official
  9. official
  10. security
  11. news
  12. news
  13. review
  14. review
  15. review
  16. review