CharityWatch (charitywatch.co.uk)
Depends
Confidence: Low
Reasonable for grantmakers and foundations that need evidence-led charity vetting reports and can absorb £149 per check.
New check
Comparison
CharityWatch (charitywatch.co.uk) and GuideStar (Candid) both land on Depends.
Reasonable for grantmakers and foundations that need evidence-led charity vetting reports and can absorb £149 per check.
Nonprofits should claim the free profile . funders and donors expect to find you there.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Grantmakers vetting charity partners | Nonprofits seeking donor trust |
| Who it's not for | Individual donors checking one charity . free watchdogs exist | Small teams wanting a simple CRM . this is a directory, not one |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.11 |
| Support quality | No user evidence available | No support evidence in sources reviewed |
| Public sentiment | Sources contain no independent reviews of this .co.uk tool; all Reddit and press discussion concerns the unrelated US.⁹ | Nonprofits value the free profile and funder recognition but voice frustration over the Candid platform swap and paid-tier costs.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Pay-per-report at £149 . recurring vetting costs compound quickly¹ | Basic profile is free; deeper data sits behind paid subscriptions . confirm current tier pricing14 |