Chartbrew
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if you're a developer-led team wanting free, self-hosted, lightweight KPI dashboards and you can patch fast.
New check
Comparison
Chartbrew and Metabase both land on Depends.
Buy it if you're a developer-led team wanting free, self-hosted, lightweight KPI dashboards and you can patch fast.
Buy it if someone on your team can host it, patch it fast, and write SQL . the free open-source core is genuinely capable BI.
| Compare | Chartbrew | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | SaaS teams tracking signups and usage KPIs | Startups wanting free BI on existing databases |
| Who it's not for | Enterprises needing SOC 2 or compliance posture | Teams with nobody to own hosting and patching |
| Privacy | Multiple 2026 CVEs including two RCEs, SQL injection, and access-control flaws; patch immediately if self-hosting. | Active 2026 vulnerability stream . four critical CVEs including an unauthenticated SQL injection; prompt patching is non-optional.11 |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support-quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reddit and review sites describe Chartbrew as an intuitive, lightweight open-source dashboard tool, though some BI users move on to alternatives.⁴ | Users like the query builder and SQL access; recurring gripes are exports, dashboard customization, and slow queries on big datasets. |
| Biggest gotcha | Self-hosting puts patching on you; unpatched instances face known RCE exploits⁷ | Self-hosting means you own patching; 2026 fixes spanned 55.13, 56.3, 57.1 and later |