Chart.js
Worth it
Confidence: High
Use it if your developers need quick, standard charts in a web app . it's free and the most popular open-source option.
Comparison
Chart.js lands on Worth it, and Metabase lands on Depends.
Use it if your developers need quick, standard charts in a web app . it's free and the most popular open-source option.
Buy it if someone on your team can host it, patch it fast, and write SQL . the free open-source core is genuinely capable BI.
| Compare | Chart.js | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Worth it | Depends |
| Best for | Developers adding charts to web apps | Startups wanting free BI on existing databases |
| Who it's not for | Non-developers wanting drag-and-drop dashboards | Teams with nobody to own hosting and patching |
| Privacy | One legacy CVE (2020) affecting 2.x versions; no current incidents in sources reviewed.⁹ | Active 2026 vulnerability stream . four critical CVEs including an unauthenticated SQL injection; prompt patching is non-optional.13 |
| Support quality | No evidence of support quality | No support-quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Users consistently praise's ease of use, responsive design, and quick chart creation.⁴ | Users like the query builder and SQL access; recurring gripes are exports, dashboard customization, and slow queries on big datasets. |
| Biggest gotcha | 2.x has CVE-2020-7746 (prototype pollution) . stay on the current major version⁹ | Self-hosting means you own patching; 2026 fixes spanned 55.13, 56.3, 57.1 and later |