Checkly
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if your engineers will maintain Playwright-based checks and want code-first synthetic monitoring cheaper than Datadog.
New check
Comparison
Checkly lands on Depends, and Better Stack lands on Worth it.
Buy if your engineers will maintain Playwright-based checks and want code-first synthetic monitoring cheaper than Datadog.
Buy if you're a startup or SMB that wants Datadog-class monitoring, on-call, and status pages without Datadog's bill.
| Compare | Checkly | Better Stack |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Dev-led engineering teams | Startups ditching Datadog bills |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical teams wanting no-code dashboards | Enterprises needing Datadog-scale APM depth |
| Privacy | Public security pages and trust center; disclosed a 2019 incident; named among victims of the 2026 Metabase zero-day.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.16 |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | Superior support praised across multiple reviews |
| Public sentiment | Developers on Reddit recommend it for API and browser monitoring while some ask for self-hosted or no-code alternatives.⁸ | Users consistently praise ease of implementation, support quality, and affordability versus Datadog.⁴ |
| Biggest gotcha | Third-party listings say $40/month entry; actual bills scale with check frequency and locations.⁶ | Responders, monitor packs, status pages, heartbeats are priced separately . bills fragment |