shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Clker vs Pixabay

Clker lands on Worth it, and Pixabay lands on Depends.

Clker versus Pixabay
CompareClkerPixabay
VerdictWorth itDepends
Best forTeachers and classroom handoutsBloggers needing free images
Who it's not forProfessional designers needing modern assetsBook or album cover designers
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; a third-party audit flags SSL status and no security page is published.²Main site shows no security page; the Pixabay Images WordPress plugin carries multiple CVEs including a 2025 RCE.
Support qualityNo support evidence in sourcesNo support-specific evidence found
Public sentimentEducators and hobbyist communities recommend it for clipart, while some users point to Pixabay for a better graphics selection.⁶Users love the free commercial-use model but repeatedly report copyright claims and demand letters from third-party uploads.12
Biggest gotchaCheck license terms before commercial or resale use . a publishing group had to ask⁷Contributor uploads you don't own can produce demand letters; you carry the legal risk14

Pick Clker when

  • Teachers and classroom handouts
  • Slide decks and school projects
  • Quick mockups needing generic clip art
  • Hobby crafts and printables

When Clker is not a fit

  • Professional designers needing modern assets
  • Commercial or resale products . licensing unclear
  • Brand work needing consistent licensed imagery
  • Anyone needing stock photos . clip art only

Pick Pixabay when

  • Bloggers needing free images
  • Background footage and mockups
  • Zero-budget creators
  • Prototypes and internal decks

When Pixabay is not a fit

  • Book or album cover designers
  • YouTube creators using its music
  • Brands needing legal indemnification
  • Anyone who cannot risk a demand letter

Sources

  1. official
  2. security
  3. security
  4. security
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. official
  11. review
  12. review
  13. review
  14. review
  15. review
  16. review