Codejudge
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy if you screen developers at volume and want real-world project tests with Greenhouse ATS integration.
Comparison
Codejudge and Codility both land on Depends.
Buy if you screen developers at volume and want real-world project tests with Greenhouse ATS integration.
Buy if you're an enterprise screening hundreds of engineering candidates and need proctoring, compliance, and ATS integration.
| Compare | Codejudge | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | High-volume tech hiring teams | Enterprise tech hiring at volume |
| Who it's not for | Startups hiring one developer a year | Startups hiring 1-2 engineers a year |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support-quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Independent feedback is thin: reviewers praise thorough coding evaluation but flag longer review times, with almost no public review volume.⁵ | Employers and review sites rate Codility highly, while developer-candidates widely complain the tests are hard, confusing, and opaquely scored.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | No published pricing; expect sales-gated quotes, so budget for negotiation and surprise costs.¹ | Pricing starts around $1,200/year on the Starter plan |