Dryad
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Researchers who must publish open, non-sensitive data under a journal or funder mandate get a curated, citable home for it.
New check
Comparison
Dryad and Figshare both land on Depends.
Researchers who must publish open, non-sensitive data under a journal or funder mandate get a curated, citable home for it.
Universities, libraries, and researchers publishing citable, DOI-backed outputs buy.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Researchers publishing open datasets | Universities and libraries |
| Who it's not for | PHI, sensitive, or identifiable human data | Businesses wanting general data storage |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Helpdesk email plus curator review process | No support-quality evidence found |
| Public sentiment | University library guides widely recommend Dryad for open-data mandates but flag its size-based fees and sensitive-data exclusions.⁶ | Institutional adopters report successful rollouts, while some individual researchers complain about unexplained takedowns. |
| Biggest gotcha | Data Publishing Charge may be billed to the unsponsored author if no institutional coverage | Takedown allegations exist; don't treat it as sole storage for irreplaceable data. |