Dryad
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Researchers who must publish open, non-sensitive data under a journal or funder mandate get a curated, citable home for it.
New check
Comparison
Dryad lands on Depends, and OSF (Open Science Framework) lands on Skip.
Researchers who must publish open, non-sensitive data under a journal or funder mandate get a curated, citable home for it.
Existing academic users should finish projects and plan migration; new researchers should pick another repository.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Skip |
| Best for | Researchers publishing open datasets | Academics sharing open data |
| Who it's not for | PHI, sensitive, or identifiable human data | Anyone starting new projects . data intake is closing |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Helpdesk email plus curator review process | No direct user-support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | University library guides widely recommend Dryad for open-data mandates but flag its size-based fees and sensitive-data exclusions.⁶ | Academics historically found OSF useful but confusing, and are now actively discussing where to migrate after the closure announcement. |
| Biggest gotcha | Data Publishing Charge may be billed to the unsponsored author if no institutional coverage | Closing to new data . new signups should choose another platform immediately14 |