DuckLake
Depends
Confidence: Medium
A strong pick for DuckDB-comfortable data teams who want lakehouse features without Iceberg's operational maze, with self-hosted bills around $10/month.
Comparison
DuckLake and MotherDuck both land on Depends.
A strong pick for DuckDB-comfortable data teams who want lakehouse features without Iceberg's operational maze, with self-hosted bills around $10/month.
Buy it if you're a small-to-mid data team that lives in SQL and wants DuckDB power with sharing and zero ops.
| Compare | DuckLake | MotherDuck |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | DuckDB-first data teams | Startups and small data teams |
| Who it's not for | Teams wanting vendor SLAs and managed support | Petabyte-scale enterprises |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁹ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No evidence of support quality for an open format | Vendor claims engaged support; thin independent evidence |
| Public sentiment | Early adopters call it refreshingly simple and fast versus Iceberg while warning it is young and AWS-centric. | Users love the simplicity and sharing, but grumble about the 2026 price hike and whether it belongs in production. |
| Biggest gotcha | Early cloud support: one user reports AWS-only, limited catalog coverage⁴ | Feb 2026 hike killed the $25 plan; entry paid tier is $250 Business |