Elsevier
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
Comparison
Elsevier vs arXiv
Elsevier lands on Depends, and arXiv lands on Worth it.
arXiv
Worth it
Confidence: High
Free, standard infrastructure for physics, math, and CS researchers to publish and read preprints.
| Compare | Elsevier | arXiv |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | University libraries with big budgets | Physics, math, CS researchers |
| Who it's not for | Unfunded authors paying APCs personally | Non-STEM researchers . minimal humanities and social science coverage |
| Privacy | No public CVEs found, but third-party reports flag a domain hijack and leaked credentials.⁶ | No known breaches of arXiv itself; documented risks are author-side . secrets leaked in public LaTeX source and prompt injection embedded in hosted papers. |
| Support quality | Trustpilot 1.8, 'Poor' | Insufficient evidence |
| Public sentiment | Acadics vent about fees, unpaid reviewing, and clunky tools; Trustpilot sits at 1.8 'Poor'.¹ | Researchers treat arXiv as indispensable infrastructure, while griping about moderation holds, endorsement hurdles, and uneven paper quality. |
| Biggest gotcha | APCs are set per journal; check the exact fee before submitting anything⁴ | LaTeX source is public . studies found researchers leaking secrets and tokens in it |
Pick Elsevier when
- University libraries with big budgets
- Researchers targeting top-tier journals
- Clinicians needing decision support
- Institutions with read-publish agreements
When Elsevier is not a fit
- Unfunded authors paying APCs personally
- Reviewers expecting payment
- Open-access-only labs
- Small teams wanting a cheap literature tool
Pick arXiv when
- Physics, math, CS researchers
- Preprint-first authors
- Literature monitoring via API
- Open-access institutional mandates
When arXiv is not a fit
- Non-STEM researchers . minimal humanities and social science coverage
- Anyone wanting peer review; material is explicitly not peer-reviewed
- First-time submitters without an endorser in their category
- Software buyers . it is free public infrastructure, nothing to purchase
Sources
- Trustpilot reviews of elsevier.comtrustpilot.comreview
review
- Journal pricing policyelsevier.comofficial
- Open access agreementselsevier.comofficial
- Elsevier LAPSUS$ domain hijack (CloudSkope)cloudskope.comsecurity
- Elsevier stealer-log credentials (Hudson Rock)hudsonrock.comsecurity
- ClinicalKey AI expansion (DrFirst blog)iprescribe.comnews
- About arXivinfo.arxiv.orgofficial
- arXiv Membership . always freeinfo.arxiv.orgofficial
- arXiv API Basicsinfo.arxiv.orgofficial
- arXiv . Wikipediaen.wikipedia.orgofficial
- arXiv declares independence from Cornellscience.orgnews
- arXiv receives $10M for upgradesnews.cornell.edunews
- arXiv bans AI-written papers for a yeartechcrunch.comnews
- arXiv bans CS review articlesnature.comnews