Elsevier
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
Comparison
Elsevier and PLOS both land on Depends.
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
Good fit if your funder mandates open access, your work is sound-but-not-flashy, and you or your library can cover the ~$2,477 APC.
| Compare | Elsevier | PLOS |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | University libraries with big budgets | Funder-mandated open access |
| Who it's not for | Unfunded authors paying APCs personally | Researchers needing fast turnaround . delays recur |
| Privacy | No public CVEs found, but third-party reports flag a domain hijack and leaked credentials.⁶ | One past data-breach notification on record; current scans report no threats; no dedicated security page found. |
| Support quality | Trustpilot 1.8, 'Poor' | Recurring complaints of long review delays |
| Public sentiment | Acadics vent about fees, unpaid reviewing, and clunky tools; Trustpilot sits at 1.8 'Poor'.¹ | Researchers on Reddit and ResearchGate repeatedly complain about long PLOS ONE review wait times, while accepting it as a reputable open-access fallback.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | APCs are set per journal; check the exact fee before submitting anything⁴ | Published APC figures conflict: $1,931 vs $2,477 . verify the current fee before submitting12 |