Felt
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if your team builds collaborative, data-rich web maps . the free tier and flat-rate billing make trying it cheap.
New check
Comparison
Felt and ArcGIS Online both land on Depends.
Buy if your team builds collaborative, data-rich web maps . the free tier and flat-rate billing make trying it cheap.
Worth buying for agencies, utilities, and enterprises with dedicated GIS staff and budget for subscriptions plus credits.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Teams building collaborative web maps | Government and public-works GIS teams |
| Who it's not for | Casual pin-droppers . free tools do that | Small teams that need one shared map |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | Actively patched vendor, but tracked XSS and CVSS 9.8 flaws, plus a 2024 breach probe involving three government users. |
| Support quality | No usable evidence in sources | No direct evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Independent user reviews are thin in the sources reviewed; a GIS subreddit thread shows a small travel business evaluating Felt for mapping.⁶ | Reviewers praise the capability and ecosystem, while Reddit threads skew critical on cost, complexity, and UX.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Free plan limits (maps, collaborators, exports) not documented in sources; verify before building² | Credits power hosting, analysis, and geocoding; heavy usage quietly inflates bills beyond the subscription. |