Figshare
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Universities, libraries, and researchers publishing citable, DOI-backed outputs should buy . proven at Springer Nature, PLOS, and University of Malta.
New check
Comparison
Figshare and Dryad both land on Depends.
Universities, libraries, and researchers publishing citable, DOI-backed outputs should buy . proven at Springer Nature, PLOS, and University of Malta.
Researchers who must publish open, non-sensitive data under a journal or funder mandate get a curated, citable home for it.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Universities and libraries | Researchers publishing open datasets |
| Who it's not for | Businesses wanting general data storage | PHI, sensitive, or identifiable human data |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.13 | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No support-quality evidence found | Helpdesk email plus curator review process |
| Public sentiment | Institutional adopters report successful rollouts, while some individual researchers complain about unexplained takedowns.12 | University library guides widely recommend Dryad for open-data mandates but flag its size-based fees and sensitive-data exclusions. |
| Biggest gotcha | Takedown allegations exist; don't treat it as sole storage for irreplaceable data.12 | Data Publishing Charge may be billed to the unsponsored author if no institutional coverage |