FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a complex, multi-entity month-end close and can absorb a sales-led, quote-based contract.
Comparison
FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation vs Financial Cents
FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation lands on Depends, and Financial Cents lands on Worth it.
Financial Cents
Worth it
Confidence: High
Buy if you run a small US accounting, bookkeeping, or tax firm that wants workflows, billing, and a client portal in one tool.
| Compare | FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation | Financial Cents |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Multi-entity month-end closes | Solo accountants & bookkeepers |
| Who it's not for | Small teams that close fine in a spreadsheet | Large firms needing Karbon/CCH-scale depth |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.16 |
| Support quality | No evidence found | No evidence in sources reviewed |
| Public sentiment | Users consistently rank FloQast as a leading close management platform, topping G2 Momentum grids in 2021 and 2022.³ | Small-firm reviewers rate it ~4.8/5 and praise ease of use, while Redditors treat it as the cheaper TaxDome alternative for tax and bookkeeping shops. |
| Biggest gotcha | Cost and financial concerns are the category's top adoption barrier; budget before demoing.⁶ | Per-user model: every new hire increases the bill14 |
Pick FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation when
- Multi-entity month-end closes
- Excel-heavy reconciliation teams
- Mid-size and enterprise accounting teams
- Teams wanting auditable AI close
When FloQast | Accounting Workflow Automation is not a fit
- Small teams that close fine in a spreadsheet
- Solo accountants and freelancers
- Buyers needing transparent, self-serve pricing
- Fully ERP-native shops avoiding Excel workflows
Pick Financial Cents when
- Solo accountants & bookkeepers
- Small US accounting firms
- Boutique bookkeeping firms
- Teams ditching spreadsheets for workflows
When Financial Cents is not a fit
- Large firms needing Karbon/CCH-scale depth
- Non-US firms . workflows are US-centric
- Non-accounting teams wanting generic PM
- Buyers requiring SOC 2 Type 2 assurance
Sources
- FloQast official sitefloqast.comofficial
- FloQast product security pagefloqast.comsecurity
- FloQast Close Reviews, Gartnergartner.comreview
- FloQast tops G2 Momentum Grid (2022)newswire.comnews
- FloQast Review 2026, LedgerBriefledgerbrief.coreview
- State of Accounting Workflow 2025 reportfinancial-cents.comreview
- PulteGroup case studyfloqast.comofficial
- Crowe-FloQast strategic alliancecrowe.comnews
- FloQast on AWS Marketplaceaws.amazon.comofficial
- FloQast reviews and pricing, SoftwareFindersoftwarefinder.comreview
- FloQast Semgrep static analysis case studysemgrep.devsecurity
- Karbon G2 ratingsg2.comreview
- Financial Cents: Accounting Practice Management Softwarefinancial-cents.comofficial
- Pricing Plans For Accounting Practice Management Softwarefinancial-cents.comofficial
- Financial Cents For Solo Professionalsfinancial-cents.comofficial
- Financial Cents Securityfinancial-cents.comsecurity
