Comparison

Font Awesome vs Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons

Font Awesome and Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons both land on Worth it.

Font Awesome

fontawesome.com

Worth it

Confidence: High

The free tier is a safe default for nearly any web project . mature, huge library, zero cost.

Read the full report

Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons

feathericons.com

Worth it

Confidence: Medium

Any product, web, or app team should adopt Feather for clean, consistent UI icons . it is free and open source.

Read the full report

Font Awesome versus Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons
Compare	Font Awesome	Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons
Verdict	Worth it	Worth it
Best for	Web projects needing quick, consistent icons	Web and app UIs needing clean line icons
Who it's not for	Performance-critical sites unwilling to subset the icon kit	Marketing sites needing colorful or filled brand icons
Privacy	Core library is largely clean; most CVEs sit in third-party WordPress plugins that integrate Font Awesome.^⁸	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.¹²
Support quality	Dev/design support gated behind Pro subscription	No support evidence; community GitHub only
Public sentiment	Long-time developers largely respect the library's breadth and reliability, but a visible minority has moved to lighter alternatives.^³	Users praise the set's clean, consistent look, while critics point to its small size versus newer icon sets.¹³
Biggest gotcha	Third-party WordPress integrations keep generating CVEs . vet plugins, not just core.	Guess: development has slowed; Lucide, a maintained Feather fork, gets newer icons faster.

Pick Font Awesome when

Web projects needing quick, consistent icons
Prototypes and MVPs
Teams wanting an open-source default
WordPress and CMS sites

When Font Awesome is not a fit

Performance-critical sites unwilling to subset the icon kit
Design teams wanting one modern, cohesive style . Lucide fits better
Anyone refusing subscriptions just for icons
Products needing fully custom iconography

Pick Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons when

Web and app UIs needing clean line icons
Zero-budget startups and side projects
Designers wanting one consistent 24x24 style
Commercial projects (MIT license)

When Feather – Simply beautiful open source icons is not a fit

Marketing sites needing colorful or filled brand icons
Teams wanting huge icon variety . the set is small
Anyone needing frequent icon updates and active maintenance
Non-technical users wanting a searchable icon marketplace

Sources

Plans & Pricing . Font Awesomefontawesome.com
official
FortAwesome/Font-Awesome on GitHubgithub.com
official
To me, Iconfiy > Font Awesome (Reddit)reddit.com
review
I'm officially done with FontAwesome (DEV)dev.to
review
Font Awesome Reviews . Product Huntproducthunt.com
review
Font Awesome Speed & Performanceswarmify.com
review
CVE-2026-6415 . WordPress plugin XSSsentinelone.com
security
CVE-2025-31861 . NVDnvd.nist.gov
security
Font Awesome . Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
news
Font Awesome . PitchBook funding profilepitchbook.com
news
Feather - Simply beautiful open source icons (official site)feathericons.com
official
feathericons/feather on GitHubgithub.com
official
Feather Reviews (2026) | Product Huntproducthunt.com
review
Feather: Simply beautiful open source icons | Product Huntproducthunt.com
review
40000+ SVG Icons: A Comprehensive Guide to the Best 13medevel.com
review
Top 20 free, Open-source Icon packs for your projectmedevel.com
review