Hugo
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Use Hugo if you have a developer comfortable with the command line and want a free, blazing-fast static site.
Comparison
Hugo and 11ty both land on Depends.
Use Hugo if you have a developer comfortable with the command line and want a free, blazing-fast static site.
Buy if you are a developer (or have one) building a fast content site and want zero licence cost.
| Compare | Hugo | 11ty |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Developer-run blogs and docs sites | Developer-built marketing sites |
| Who it's not for | Non-technical marketers needing WYSIWYG editing | Non-technical teams wanting a drag-and-drop builder |
| Privacy | Active project with fast patching; one HIGH (CVSS 8.6) CVE and one moderate advisory found . no breaches reported.⁷ | Core project maintains a security policy and hardened npm publishing; no core breaches found, but one malicious third-party plugin and dependency audit warnings exist. |
| Support quality | Community forum and GitHub only, no vendor SLA | Community-only help; no vendor SLA evidence. |
| Public sentiment | Community discussion centers on Hugo's build speed and flexibility, with a consistent learning-curve caveat around templates and self-managed deploys.⁴ | Developer sentiment is strongly positive on speed and simplicity, with recurring caveats that it demands coding skills and its project direction has sparked debate. |
| Biggest gotcha | CVE-2026-75926 (CVSS 8.6) hit versions 0.162.0-0.164.x . update promptly.⁷ | No paid support or SLA exists; help is docs, forums, and community goodwill.15 |