Gramps-project
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Use it if you are a serious family historian comfortable with open-source software and community-only support . it is completely free and unusually deep.
New check
Comparison
Gramps-project lands on Depends, and FamilySearch lands on Worth it.
Use it if you are a serious family historian comfortable with open-source software and community-only support . it is completely free and unusually deep.
Use it: it is genuinely free with a deep record archive and the largest single family tree online.
| Compare | Gramps-project | FamilySearch |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Serious hobbyist genealogists | Budget-conscious genealogists |
| Who it's not for | Casual users who want a quick, pretty family tree | Anyone wanting a private, locked-down family tree |
| Privacy | One critical CVSS 9.1 path-traversal CVE in the Gramps Web API (April 2026); desktop app not implicated in reviewed sources.⁷ | One confirmed 2022 breach, disclosed ~7 months late; MFA added from 2023; no other known issues. |
| Support quality | Volunteer-run; forum support only | No reliable support-quality evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Users praise Gramps as the deepest tool in its category but note it is volunteer-run and divides opinion on usability.⁴ | Sentiment is polarized: users praise the free records but frequently slam the interface, shared-tree edits, and site behavior. |
| Biggest gotcha | CVE-2026-40258: Zip Slip path traversal in Gramps Web media import . self-hosters must patch⁷ | Anyone can edit deceased ancestors on the shared tree; no private tree option14 |