Grasshopper
Depends
Confidence: Medium
A reasonable pick for a solo founder or tiny US team that just needs a second business number on their phones.
Comparison
Grasshopper lands on Depends, and Quo (formerly OpenPhone) lands on Worth it.
A reasonable pick for a solo founder or tiny US team that just needs a second business number on their phones.
Buy if you are a startup or small team wanting shared numbers, texts, and calls in one simple app . that is exactly who it is built for.
| Compare | Grasshopper | Quo (formerly OpenPhone) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Solo founders needing a second number | Startups and small businesses |
| Who it's not for | Healthcare providers . not HIPAA compliant | Large enterprises needing complex call-center routing |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found for this product in reviewed sources; not HIPAA compliant per HIPAA Journal.15 | SOC 2 Type II certified; TLS 1.2+ in transit and AES-256 at rest. |
| Support quality | Advertises 24/7; billing complaints suggest otherwise | One-on-one support praised in App Store review |
| Public sentiment | Multi-year users complain most about hidden fees, billing, and cancellation, while reviewers acknowledge the core service is simple and functional.⁸ | Users consistently praise ease of use, call quality, and shared numbers; complaints are sparse in the reviewed sources.⁶ |
| Biggest gotcha | Hidden fees reportedly accumulate over years; audit every invoice before committing⁸ | Starter's $15/user is annual billing; month-to-month costs $19/user |