Gumloop
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if your team builds multi-step AI workflows at scale and wants IT-governed access and compliance.
New check
Comparison
Gumloop and Lindy both land on Depends.
Buy it if your team builds multi-step AI workflows at scale and wants IT-governed access and compliance.
Buy it if your team wants a no-code AI employee for email, support, and scheduling and can live with metered credits.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Marketing and ops teams automating research and data workflows | Ops and sales teams automating email, support, scheduling |
| Who it's not for | Anyone needing 1-2 simple automations . use Zapier instead | Enterprises needing audited SOC 2 or SAML proof before purchase |
| Privacy | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, and HIPAA-compliant with Microsoft 365 certification.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.12 |
| Support quality | No usable data in reviewed sources | No support evidence in reviewed sources. |
| Public sentiment | Users consistently praise how easy Gumloop makes building AI workflows, while noting it can feel heavy and credit costs grow with usage.¹ | Early users praise it as an easy no-code automation tool, but public review volume is very small.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Credit-based model: AI-heavy runs burn credits fast; model per-run costs first.⁵ | Credits: 3k/user/month included, top-ups $10 per 1,000. Heavy agent use inflates bills fast.11 |