HouseSittersAmerica
Depends
Confidence: Medium
US homeowners get a strong deal: free to join, a one-time fee instead of subscriptions, and a 4.8/5 Feefo rating.
Comparison
HouseSittersAmerica and Housesitter both land on Depends.
US homeowners get a strong deal: free to join, a one-time fee instead of subscriptions, and a 4.8/5 Feefo rating.
Occasional travelers and homeowners may find sits here, but direct evidence is thin and the site itself warns about scammers using its listings.
| Compare | HouseSittersAmerica | Housesitter |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | US-only homeowners on a budget | Homeowners needing short-notice sits |
| Who it's not for | International or non-US users | Anyone expecting vetted, insured sitters |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁵ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.16 |
| Support quality | High Feefo average, but public removal complaints exist | Complaints exist but details unverified |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers position it as a cheaper, US-only alternative to TrustedHousesitters, with mostly strong Feefo scores and a minority of complaint stories.⁶ | Direct reviews are scarce (~65 on Trustpilot) and most public review volume covers competitor TrustedHousesitters instead.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: platform likely doesn't insure sits or mediate disputes; read terms first | Site itself warns scammers use job listings . verify sitters and avoid off-platform payments16 |