HouseSittersAmerica
Depends
Confidence: Medium
US homeowners get a strong deal: free to join, a one-time fee instead of subscriptions, and a 4.8/5 Feefo rating.
Comparison
HouseSittersAmerica and MindMyHouse both land on Depends.
US homeowners get a strong deal: free to join, a one-time fee instead of subscriptions, and a 4.8/5 Feefo rating.
Buy if you're a budget homeowner or sitter in a popular region willing to vet matches yourself.
| Compare | HouseSittersAmerica | MindMyHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | US-only homeowners on a budget | Budget homeowners |
| Who it's not for | International or non-US users | Owners wanting vetted, insured sitters |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁵ | No known public breaches; site claims fraud-proof system, but fewer built-in protections than larger platforms. |
| Support quality | High Feefo average, but public removal complaints exist | No direct support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers position it as a cheaper, US-only alternative to TrustedHousesitters, with mostly strong Feefo scores and a minority of complaint stories.⁶ | Budget-focused users praise the low price and prefer it over pricier rivals, while some report a thin marketplace and uneven sit quality.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: platform likely doesn't insure sits or mediate disputes; read terms first | No sitter vetting or insurance included . screen candidates yourself⁹ |