JetBrains
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Professional developers on Java, Kotlin, or .NET get unmatched IDE depth and should buy.
New check
Comparison
JetBrains and Zed both land on Depends.
Professional developers on Java, Kotlin, or .NET get unmatched IDE depth and should buy.
Buy it if you're a developer who wants a fast, free, open-source editor and can live with token-billed AI costs and recent CVE churn.
| Compare | JetBrains | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | JVM/Kotlin teams | Professional developers wanting a fast, minimal editor |
| Who it's not for | Hobbyists . free editors like VS Code do the job | Non-developers . this is strictly a code editor |
| Privacy | Multiple real CVEs, including a critical known-exploited TeamCity RCE and a 2026 incident with compromised AWS IAM users.⁶ | Active risk: six CVEs disclosed across 2025-2026 (symlink escapes, Zip Slip, info disclosure); vendor does coordinate disclosure and ships security features like Worktree Trust. |
| Support quality | No direct support evidence found | No support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Sentiment is split: long-time users praise the depth but complain about bloat, price hikes, and AI credit costs.¹ | Users consistently praise Zed's speed and simplicity, but report rough edges, pricing changes, and security frustrations. |
| Biggest gotcha | AI Pro uses credit consumption; users report costs ballooning with Junie⁵ | Patch fast: symlink-escape and Zip Slip CVEs hit the editor and extension archives in 2026. |