JSHint
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fine (and free) if you need a quick JavaScript error checker for legacy or small codebases.
New check
Comparison
JSHint lands on Depends, and ESLint lands on Worth it.
Fine (and free) if you need a quick JavaScript error checker for legacy or small codebases.
Buy if your team writes JavaScript . ESLint is the free, default linter with a huge plugin ecosystem.
| Compare | JSHint | ESLint |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Quick browser-based JS sanity checks | JavaScript/TypeScript dev teams |
| Who it's not for | New greenfield JS projects | Non-technical teams . nothing to lint |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁴ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.10 |
| Support quality | Guess: volunteers only, no paid support | Community OSS; no support data found |
| Public sentiment | Developers have long praised it as a free, no-fuss JavaScript error checker, though current recommendations skew toward newer tools like ESLint.⁶ | Practitioner sources overwhelmingly treat ESLint as the default JavaScript linter across tutorials, CI setups, and production stacks.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Volunteer-maintained; expect no roadmap or uptime promises³ | Free, but real cost is engineer time: config, plugins, and major-version upgrade migrations.12 |