JSHint
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fine (and free) if you need a quick JavaScript error checker for legacy or small codebases.
New check
Comparison
JSHint lands on Depends, and Prettier lands on Worth it.
Fine (and free) if you need a quick JavaScript error checker for legacy or small codebases.
If your team writes JavaScript/TypeScript and wants style debates gone, Prettier is the free de facto standard.
| Compare | JSHint | Prettier |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Worth it |
| Best for | Quick browser-based JS sanity checks | JS/TS teams tired of style debates |
| Who it's not for | New greenfield JS projects | Speed-critical repos . Biome formats far faster |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁴ | Core prettier package unaffected, but two ecosystem plugins (eslint-config-prettier, eslint-plugin-prettier) were compromised via npm in July 2025 (CVE-2025-54313); fixed versions shipped. |
| Support quality | Guess: volunteers only, no paid support | Community-maintained OSS; no support evidence found. |
| Public sentiment | Developers have long praised it as a free, no-fuss JavaScript error checker, though current recommendations skew toward newer tools like ESLint.⁶ | Sentiment favors consistency and ending debates, with recurring complaints about speed, rigid style, and a minority switching to lighter tools.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Volunteer-maintained; expect no roadmap or uptime promises³ | CVE-2025-54313: eslint-config-prettier hijacked July 2025; only 10.1.6+ is safe . audit lockfiles. |