Kili Technology vs Labelbox

Kili Technology and Labelbox both land on Depends.

Kili Technology

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy if you're an enterprise ML team labeling large volumes of image, text, or LLM training data with compliance requirements.

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy if you run a serious ML operation needing scaled labeling, RLHF, and eval pipelines with enterprise budget.

Kili Technology versus Labelbox
Compare	Kili Technology	Labelbox
Verdict	Depends	Depends
Best for	Enterprise ML data teams	ML teams labeling at scale
Who it's not for	Small teams labeling a few hundred samples	Solo devs labeling a few hundred images
Privacy	Strong posture: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, HIPAA claimed, on-prem option, published trust center.¹⁰	ISO 27001:2022 certified; no public breaches found in sources reviewed; one third-party index grades data safety 'D'.
Support quality	No direct support reviews found	Support docs exist; no strong review evidence
Public sentiment	Public review volume is modest (53 on G2) and available snippets skew positive, describing a distinctive, complete annotation suite.^³	G2 users praise the interface and feature depth, while pricing complaints and freelancer payment disputes recur across review sites.¹⁵
Biggest gotcha	No transparent pricing; expect sales calls and negotiated enterprise contracts.^⁵	LBU consumption billing means costs scale with usage; heavy labeling can spike invoices fast.

Small teams labeling a few hundred samples
Buyers wanting transparent self-serve pricing
Anyone seeking EU AI Act compliance software . that hook is just lead-gen content
Projects without a dedicated ML lead to run the platform