Labellerr
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you're an ML team labeling real volumes of image/video data and want automation below Labelbox-style pricing.
New check
Comparison
Labellerr and Roboflow both land on Depends.
Buy if you're an ML team labeling real volumes of image/video data and want automation below Labelbox-style pricing.
Buy if your team continuously builds, labels, or deploys computer vision models and wants one hosted platform.
| Compare | Labellerr | Roboflow |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | ML teams labeling image and video data | Teams building custom vision models |
| Who it's not for | Hobbyists labeling a few hundred images . free CVAT/Label Studio wins | One-off projects . train one model, never return |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁸ | Trust center, SOC2/PCI claims; one high-severity vulnerability flagged in open-source inference package (Sep 2026).15 |
| Support quality | Only vendor case studies; no independent support reviews | No support quality evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Review coverage on G2, Capterra, and SoftwareFinder trends positive, but sources expose only truncated snippets . read full reviews before buying.¹ | Beginners and small teams praise the UI and approachability, while long-time users complain the new pricing costs more for less.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Pro plan's starting price isn't surfaced publicly . confirm per-user vs per-label costs before committing.⁷ | Pricing restructured recently; legacy basic tier was $65/month . users say new plans cost more for less14 |