LetX
Depends
Confidence: Low
Students and academics who want free collaborative LaTeX with ready-made templates can try it, but don't pay before verifying pricing and support.
New check
Comparison
LetX and Overleaf both land on Depends.
Students and academics who want free collaborative LaTeX with ready-made templates can try it, but don't pay before verifying pricing and support.
Buy it if you or your team writes in LaTeX and collaborates . it is the category default with 30M+ users and university backing.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Students writing theses | Academic paper co-authoring |
| Who it's not for | Teams needing a battle-tested editor . Overleaf's track record is far deeper | Writers who don't need LaTeX markup |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁸ | FedRAMP-authorized for government use; two moderate CVEs disclosed Sept 2024; open-source with public advisories. |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No reliable support-rating evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reviews are scarce: 2.5/5 on G2 from just three reviews, with scattered positive posts about its collaborative editing.¹ | Users broadly treat Overleaf as the standard for collaborative LaTeX but gripe about free-tier limits, recent product changes, and whether Pro is worth paying for. |
| Biggest gotcha | Public pricing not surfaced in reviewed sources . confirm exact costs before paying.² | Free plan limits (collaborators, compile time, storage) are the main upsell trigger . check before committing. |