Linq
Depends
Confidence: Low
The all-in-one pitch fits small trade businesses wanting scheduling, dispatch, and payments together, but evidence is thin (low confidence): no independent reviews, public pricing, or security page found.
New check
Comparison
Linq and Jobber both land on Depends.
The all-in-one pitch fits small trade businesses wanting scheduling, dispatch, and payments together, but evidence is thin (low confidence): no independent reviews, public pricing, or security page found.
Buy if you run a small home-service crew that wants dead-simple quoting, scheduling, and invoicing.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Trade businesses (HVAC, plumbing, electrical) | Solo operators and small home-service crews |
| Who it's not for | Anyone wanting a vendor with independent reviews | Price-sensitive shops adding many users |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed, but no public security page was found for this product either.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.15 |
| Support quality | No support reviews found | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | No verifiable user reviews for this product were found; public 'Linq' reviews cover a Las Vegas hotel, a language-learning app, and digital business cards.⁴ | Users praise ease of use for small crews but repeatedly complain about rising per-user pricing and limited historical reporting.⁶ |
| Biggest gotcha | Handles customer payments and calls yet publishes no security or compliance details² | Critics call the pricing structure a trap; real costs exceed sticker. |