Lovable
Depends
Confidence: High
Buy if you're a non-technical founder or marketer prototyping MVPs and internal tools fast.
New check
Comparison
Lovable and Dyad both land on Depends.
Buy if you're a non-technical founder or marketer prototyping MVPs and internal tools fast.
Buy if you're a developer who wants a free, local Lovable alternative and can review generated code.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Non-coders prototyping MVPs | Indie developers and tinkerers |
| Who it's not for | Production apps holding real user data | Non-technical founders who can't read code |
| Privacy | Known CVE-2025-48757 (row-level security information disclosure); repeated 2025-2026 incidents; company has since published fixes and hardening.⁵ | One critical RCE (CVE-2025-58766) disclosed in v0.19.0; fixed upstream . run the latest release. |
| Support quality | Reviewers call support almost non-existent | No evidence on support responsiveness |
| Public sentiment | Users love the speed for prototypes and MVPs but complain about credit costs, weak support, and inconsistent quality.¹ | Reddit and G2 users praise Dyad as a powerful, free local alternative to Lovable, with complaints limited to Pro pricing. |
| Biggest gotcha | Credit model means costs balloon as you iterate; Reddit threads call pricing a hidden trap10 | Patch immediately if running v0.19.0 or older . CVE-2025-58766 allowed code execution via the preview window. |