Mad Paws
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Reasonable buy if you're an Australian pet owner who wants home-based care instead of kennels and will vet sitters yourself.
New check
Comparison
Mad Paws and Pawshake both land on Depends.
Reasonable buy if you're an Australian pet owner who wants home-based care instead of kennels and will vet sitters yourself.
Reasonable for cheap, low-stakes bookings in cities with plenty of sitters, if you vet profiles yourself.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Australian dog owners travelling | Budget bookings in dense cities |
| Who it's not for | Pet owners outside Australia | Owners of anxious, elderly or high-value pets |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Booking dispute escalated to legal advice on Reddit | Multiple unresolved-dispute reports despite submitted evidence |
| Public sentiment | Owners generally like the care versus kennels, but some distrust the marketplace and payment-holding disputes surface on legal forums.⁵ | Reviews are sharply polarised: some owners and sitters report easy repeat bookings, while others allege weak vetting and poor dispute support.11 |
| Biggest gotcha | Money is held by Mad Paws after you approve a booking; disputes reportedly get messy⁷ | Service fee added at checkout, not included in listed sitter rates |