Malt
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy it if you hire European freelancers and want contracts, payments, and admin handled; public evidence is thin.
New check
Comparison
Malt and Upwork both land on Depends.
Buy it if you hire European freelancers and want contracts, payments, and admin handled; public evidence is thin.
Good fit if you occasionally need freelance help and can stomach the fee stack; poor fit for full-time hires or freelancers who can find work elsewhere.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | European teams hiring freelancers | Occasional freelance hires |
| Who it's not for | Companies hiring full-time employees | Full-time, long-term hires |
| Privacy | No public security page found; Malt says it uses AI to match talent and ensure security.⁸ | Runs a HackerOne bug bounty and enterprise security program; one alleged, unconfirmed recruiter/freelancer database leak circulated. |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | PissedConsumer and Trustpilot complaint volume; dispute stories |
| Public sentiment | Trustpilot hosts buyer reviews of, but sources reviewed contain little detailed user feedback.¹ | Sentiment splits: clients still find talent easily, but many freelancers and some clients say fees, Connects, and support have eroded the value.12 |
| Biggest gotcha | Fees apply to client billing; exact commission rates are not public in sources reviewed⁷ | Freelancers buy Connects per bid; spend adds up before earning anything |