shouldiuse.io

Comparison

MDPI vs Elsevier

MDPI and Elsevier both land on Depends.

MDPI

Depends
Confidence: Medium

Reasonable if you need fast, funded open-access publication and your institution accepts MDPI journals.

Add this comparison to your site

Put the MDPI vs Elsevier badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent comparison.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

MDPI versus Elsevier
CompareMDPIElsevier
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forResearchers needing fast open-access publicationUniversity libraries with big budgets
Who it's not forTenure-track researchers building prestige CVsUnfunded authors paying APCs personally
PrivacyOne known incident: in August 2016 manuscript submission system logs were intercepted and copied; MDPI appears in breach databases.³No public CVEs found, but third-party reports flag a domain hijack and leaked credentials.
Support qualityMixed author reports; employees warn against companyTrustpilot 1.8, 'Poor'
Public sentimentAcademic forum sentiment is split: users praise the fast turnaround but heavily criticize review rigor, fees, and reputation.Acadics vent about fees, unpaid reviewing, and clunky tools; Trustpilot sits at 1.8 'Poor'.13
Biggest gotchaMany researchers report peers and hiring committees discount MDPI lines on a CV.⁷APCs are set per journal; check the exact fee before submitting anything16

Pick MDPI when

  • Researchers needing fast open-access publication
  • Authors with grant or institutional APC funding
  • Interdisciplinary work without an obvious journal home
  • Authors whose institutions already accept MDPI titles

When MDPI is not a fit

  • Tenure-track researchers building prestige CVs
  • Anyone whose institution discounts or flags MDPI journals
  • Authors who cannot pay an APC out of pocket
  • Fields where MDPI outlets carry stigma with peers and hiring committees

Pick Elsevier when

  • University libraries with big budgets
  • Researchers targeting top-tier journals
  • Clinicians needing decision support
  • Institutions with read-publish agreements

When Elsevier is not a fit

  • Unfunded authors paying APCs personally
  • Reviewers expecting payment
  • Open-access-only labs
  • Small teams wanting a cheap literature tool

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. security
  4. security
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. review
  12. MDPI . Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news
  13. review
  14. review
  15. review
  16. official