MDPI
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Reasonable if you need fast, funded open-access publication and your institution accepts MDPI journals.
New check
Comparison
MDPI and Elsevier both land on Depends.
Reasonable if you need fast, funded open-access publication and your institution accepts MDPI journals.
Worth using if your institution's library pays and your field's top journals are Elsevier.
| Compare | MDPI | Elsevier |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Researchers needing fast open-access publication | University libraries with big budgets |
| Who it's not for | Tenure-track researchers building prestige CVs | Unfunded authors paying APCs personally |
| Privacy | One known incident: in August 2016 manuscript submission system logs were intercepted and copied; MDPI appears in breach databases.³ | No public CVEs found, but third-party reports flag a domain hijack and leaked credentials. |
| Support quality | Mixed author reports; employees warn against company | Trustpilot 1.8, 'Poor' |
| Public sentiment | Academic forum sentiment is split: users praise the fast turnaround but heavily criticize review rigor, fees, and reputation. | Acadics vent about fees, unpaid reviewing, and clunky tools; Trustpilot sits at 1.8 'Poor'.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | Many researchers report peers and hiring committees discount MDPI lines on a CV.⁷ | APCs are set per journal; check the exact fee before submitting anything16 |