Mettl
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run high-volume hiring, campus recruitment, or proctored exams and have HR bandwidth to manage it.
New check
Comparison
Mettl and HackerEarth both land on Depends.
Buy if you run high-volume hiring, campus recruitment, or proctored exams and have HR bandwidth to manage it.
Buy if you screen developers at volume and want coding assessments, interviews, and hackathons in one suite.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | High-volume campus hiring | Recruiters screening developers at volume |
| Who it's not for | Small teams hiring a few roles a year | Teams hiring fewer than a few devs a year |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁵ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No product-support evidence found | No support-specific evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Employers rate it 4.4/5 on G2 and praise ease of use, while test-takers complain about browser installs, proctoring friction, and privacy.⁶ | G2 and Capterra reviewers are broadly positive on ease of use, while candidates and some users report frustration and thin independent reviews elsewhere.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Quote-based pricing: no per-test checkout; confirm overage and annual-commitment terms in the contract² | Some questions are publicly available . candidates may pre-study leaked items |