Mettl
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run high-volume hiring, campus recruitment, or proctored exams and have HR bandwidth to manage it.
New check
Comparison
Mettl and Xobin both land on Depends.
Buy if you run high-volume hiring, campus recruitment, or proctored exams and have HR bandwidth to manage it.
Evidence is thin and almost entirely first-party, so confidence is low.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | High-volume campus hiring | High-volume campus hiring |
| Who it's not for | Small teams hiring a few roles a year | Teams hiring a few people a year |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁵ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | No product-support evidence found | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Employers rate it 4.4/5 on G2 and praise ease of use, while test-takers complain about browser installs, proctoring friction, and privacy.⁶ | No independent verbatim user reviews were found in the sources reviewed; Xobin's own pages cite G2 recognition. |
| Biggest gotcha | Quote-based pricing: no per-test checkout; confirm overage and annual-commitment terms in the contract² | Pricing undisclosed in reviewed sources; expect negotiated, volume-based quotes after a demo call |