MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Adopt it if you run a security team or CSIRT that collects and shares threat indicators and can self-host.
Comparison
MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform and Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) both land on Depends.
Adopt it if you run a security team or CSIRT that collects and shares threat indicators and can self-host.
Buy if you run a staffed SOC or threat-intel function and want an open-source, self-hostable platform with strong ratings.
| Compare | MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform | Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | CSIRTs and CERT teams | SOC and threat-intel teams |
| Who it's not for | Small teams without dedicated security staff | Small businesses with no dedicated security staff |
| Privacy | Transparent disclosure culture; fixes within ~48 hours; several historical XSS/auth CVEs, all patched.² | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Community default; commercial support sold separately. | No evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | The one practitioner quote found calls it a favorite, flexible open source tool for intel feeds when set up correctly.⁴ | Reddit threat-intel communities actively evaluate and debate OpenCTI as a TIP, and G2 reviewers rate Filigran 4.6/5.⁷ |
| Biggest gotcha | Free license, real cost is admin time: setup, tuning, syncs, patching.⁴ | Enterprise pricing is quote-only via private AWS Marketplace offers; no list prices16 |