shouldiuse.io

Comparison

MOJO Marketplace vs CodeCanyon

MOJO Marketplace lands on Skip, and CodeCanyon lands on Depends.

MOJO Marketplace versus CodeCanyon
CompareMOJO MarketplaceCodeCanyon
VerdictSkipDepends
Best forBluehost/HostGator customers wanting one-click installsDevelopers needing code shortcuts
Who it's not forTheme/plugin sellers seeking active buyersNon-developers expecting a finished, working product
PrivacyHudson Rock lists 1,751 infostealer credentials linked to the domain (medium threat); the official WordPress plugin is archived.⁵No known public vulnerabilities found in CodeCanyon itself; several CVEs affect scripts sold on the marketplace.15
Support qualityStrong negative Reddit sentiment, no positive signalsAuthor support costs extra, expires; complaints common.
Public sentimentFeedback is sparse and mostly negative: sellers question whether the marketplace is still alive and Reddit sentiment is openly hostile.²Feedback is mixed: buyers like the cheap catalog, but recurring complaints cover support, review moderation, and uneven script quality.11
Biggest gotchaHudson Rock flags 1,751 infostealer credentials tied to the domain . medium threat posture⁵Buyer reviews reported removed quietly, so ratings may not reflect quality.

Pick MOJO Marketplace when

  • Bluehost/HostGator customers wanting one-click installs
  • Hobbyist WordPress sites on EIG hosting
  • Legacy buyers of themes already purchased there

When MOJO Marketplace is not a fit

  • Theme/plugin sellers seeking active buyers
  • Anyone wanting a current, well-reviewed marketplace
  • Security-sensitive teams
  • Non-WordPress projects

Pick CodeCanyon when

  • Developers needing code shortcuts
  • WordPress owners adding features cheaply
  • Freelancers prototyping client projects
  • Small PHP/Bootstrap builds

When CodeCanyon is not a fit

  • Non-developers expecting a finished, working product
  • Teams needing audited, vendor-supported software
  • Production apps with compliance or security requirements
  • Buyers unwilling to maintain and patch code themselves

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. official
  5. security
  6. news
  7. review
  8. review
  9. official
  10. news
  11. review
  12. review
  13. review
  14. news
  15. security
  16. security