Nutrola
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Worth trying if you want photo-first AI food logging and are willing to vet subscription terms yourself.
New check
Comparison
Nutrola and Cal AI both land on Depends.
Worth trying if you want photo-first AI food logging and are willing to vet subscription terms yourself.
Fine for casual, photo-based calorie tracking if you accept estimate-level accuracy and a paid subscription.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | People who hate manual food logging | Casual dieters wanting photo-based logging |
| Who it's not for | Subscription-averse users, annual plans reported | Privacy-conscious users. 3M health profiles leaked in 2026 |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; however, the product security page returns 404 and the GridinSoft trust score is 79/100.⁴ | Breached: 3M user records including health profiles exposed March 2026; a product security page now exists.15 |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Independent user feedback is sparse in the reviewed sources; an App Store reviewer mentions paying for a one-year plan, while most Reddit-sourced praise appears via Nutrola's own blog.¹ | Users praise photo-scan convenience but flag accuracy limits, bugs, and paid-only access. |
| Biggest gotcha | Comparison articles naming winners are self-published; treat claims like 'lab-verified data' as unverified marketing. | Leaked data includes health profiles; post-breach phishing and identity-theft risk is real16 |