Octoparse
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if you're a non-coder scraping straightforward sites occasionally . start on the free plan and upgrade only if it holds up.
Comparison
Octoparse and G2 both land on Depends.
Buy it if you're a non-coder scraping straightforward sites occasionally . start on the free plan and upgrade only if it holds up.
Buyers shortlisting B2B software should use G2 free as one input, cross-checked against Capterra or TrustRadius.
| Compare | Octoparse | G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Non-coders scraping simple, static sites | B2B software buyers shortlisting tools |
| Who it's not for | Developers . a Python script beats it | Vendors without five-figure budgets |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.11 | No public security page found; UpGuard reports no phishing; G2's own DPA references a past data breach. |
| Support quality | Reviewers describe support as extremely helpful | Trustpilot and BBB complaints about G2's service |
| Public sentiment | Opinion is split: praise for no-code scraping on simple sites, sharp complaints about auto-detection, stability, and billing.³ | Buyers find G2 useful for breadth, but sentiment on G2's own service skews negative on Trustpilot and Redditors weigh it against Capterra and Trustpilot. |
| Biggest gotcha | Plans gate by seats and tasks; overages inflate the bill fast10 | Vendor contracts are negotiated and opaque; budget five figures annually before committing. |